Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.21 seconds)

Sasi Thomas vs State & Ors on 24 November, 2006

17. On going by these decisions, it appears that the determination order issued by the 4th respondent as per Ext.P1 is not a well considered order, which does not consider the aspects already held by this Court in the 11 W.P.(C) No.28757 of 2016 reported decisions as mentioned above. Under such circumstances, I set aside the impugned order and direct the 4th respondent to reconsider the issue in the light of the decision in Welfare Fund Inspector v. Jaya and Sasi V. and others v. State of Kerala and Others cited supra.
Supreme Court of India Cites 24 - Cited by 55 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Welfare Fund Inspector vs Jaya on 13 June, 2006

17. On going by these decisions, it appears that the determination order issued by the 4th respondent as per Ext.P1 is not a well considered order, which does not consider the aspects already held by this Court in the 11 W.P.(C) No.28757 of 2016 reported decisions as mentioned above. Under such circumstances, I set aside the impugned order and direct the 4th respondent to reconsider the issue in the light of the decision in Welfare Fund Inspector v. Jaya and Sasi V. and others v. State of Kerala and Others cited supra.
Kerala High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 3 - P R Raman - Full Document
1