Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.55 seconds)
The State Of Bihar & Ors vs M/S Star Build Max Pvt. Ltd. & Ors on 6 February, 2017 cites

Jagdish Mandal vs State Of Orissa & Ors on 11 December, 2006

9. The argument of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the rate offered by the petitioner is much less than the rate offered by the successful tenderer, therefore, the State would be spending more amount; had the contract been awarded to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner relies upon a Supreme Court order reported as Jagdish Mandal Vs. State of Orissa and others, (2007) 14 SCC 517, particularly paragraph 22 which reads as under:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 887 - R V Raveendran - Full Document

M/S Star Build Max Pvt. Ltd vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 27 July, 2015

In the meantime, the petitioner invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court challenging the black-listing of the petitioner in C.W.J.C. No. 9437 of 2015 (M/s Star Build Max Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.). The petitioner also challenged the order of cancellation of tender process by Engineer-in-Chief. This Court Patna High Court CWJC No.17889 of 2015 dt.06-02-2017 4/8 directed the petitioner to file an appeal under the provisions of Bihar Contractors Rules, 2007 vide order dated 27th of July, 2015. It was also ordered that the petitioner shall be allowed to participate in the tender process which was ordered to be subject to the result of appeal. The relevant extract from the order reads as under:-
Patna High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 3 - K K Mandal - Full Document
1