C.C.R.H. Scientists Welfare ... vs Union Of India on 15 December, 2011
2. Mr. Shivam Tripathi, learned proxy counsel for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 seeks further extension of time to file reply. Such request is opposed by Mr. N.L. Bareja, learned counsel for applicant on the ground that Honble High Court of Delhi has already taken a view in President CCRH Scientists Welfare Association & another v. Union of India & others (W.P. (C) No.11962/2009) decided on 31.3.2011 on an identical proposition and has issued directions for extension of benefits of CGHS admissible to the retired employees, pensioners and family pensioners of the Government of India and its organizations to the employees of CCRH and NMML. Mr. Bareja further submitted that the applicant would be satisfied if a direction is given to respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to examine his claim in view of the said judgment of the Honble High Court of Delhi and take a final decision in the matter. Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 have been given sufficient time to file their counter reply but they have failed to avail the opportunities. Besides their stand is reflected in paragraph 4.9 of the counter reply dated 7.11.2013 presented by M/s Legal Axis Attorneys & Solicitors, which reads as under:-