Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.25 seconds)Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 7 in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Section 224 in Government of India Act, 1935 [Entire Act]
Section 107 in Government of India Act, 1935 [Entire Act]
Section 9 in The Foreigners Act, 1946 [Entire Act]
Central Council For Research In ... vs Bikartan Das on 16 August, 2023
Therefore, the matter is remanded by
directing the authorities to make a fresh enquiry, then it would amount to allow
the petitioner to fill-up the lacuna in her defence, which is beyond the powers
permissible to be exercised under certiorari jurisdiction, for which the case of
Bikartan Das (supra) and Hari Vishnu Kamath (supra) have been referred to.
Hari Vishnu Kamath vs Syed Ahmad Ishaque And Others on 9 December, 1954
Therefore, the matter is remanded by
directing the authorities to make a fresh enquiry, then it would amount to allow
the petitioner to fill-up the lacuna in her defence, which is beyond the powers
permissible to be exercised under certiorari jurisdiction, for which the case of
Bikartan Das (supra) and Hari Vishnu Kamath (supra) have been referred to.
R. Kamalananda vs The Secretary Home (Prison) Department ... on 25 February, 2019
In this connection, reference must be made to the decision in R. v. Governor of
Wormwood Scrubs Prison, ex p Boydell [R. v. Governor of Wormwood Scrubs Prison,
ex p Boydell, (1948) 2 KB 193 (DC)] . There, the applicant was condemned by a court
martial sitting in Germany, and in execution of its sentence, he was imprisoned in
England. He applied for a writ of habeas corpus, and contended that the military court
had no jurisdiction over him. The Court agreed with this contention, and held that the
conviction was without jurisdiction and accordingly issued a writ of habeas corpus. But
as he was in the custody of the Governor of the Prison under a warrant of conviction,
unless the conviction itself was quashed no writ of habeas corpus could issue. In these
circumstances, the Court issued a writ of certiorari quashing the conviction by the
court martial. It is to be noted that the military court was an ad hoc body, and was not
in existence at the time of the writ, and the respondents to the application were the
Governor and the Secretary for War. The fact that the court martial was dissolved was
not considered a bar to the grant of certiorari.
The Lloyds Bank Ltd. vs The Lloyds Ank Indian Staff Association ... on 20 April, 1953
21. Our attention has also been invited to a decision of this Court in Lloyds Bank
Ltd. v. Indian Staff Assn. [Lloyds Bank Ltd. v. Indian Staff Assn., (1953) 1 SCC 770 :