Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 31 (1.73 seconds)
Ge Capital Transportation Financial ... vs Rahisuddin Khan on 9 September, 2011 cites

Indian Oil Corporation Ltd vs Municipal Corporation & Anr on 7 April, 1995

In my opinion, the earlier decision of the Apex Court in K. Bhaskaran(supra) is to be followed since it is the law of the land as it has not been overruled till date by the larger bench of the Supreme Court in view of doctrine of „binding precedent‟ and decision of the Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in the case of Central Board of Dawoodi Bohra Community (supra) (para 12) and the decisions of the Supreme Court in the case of Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. Vs. Municipal Corporation & Anr. (supra); Babu Parasu Kaikadi (supra) (paras 14 & 18); in the case of Union of India & Ors. (supra) (Para 12); Commissioner of Sales Tax, J&K & Ors.(supra) (Paras 10, 13, 17) and the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Virender Kumar @ Bittoo (supra) (Paras 29-34).
Supreme Court of India Cites 18 - Cited by 98 - Full Document

K. Bhaskaran vs Sankaran Vaidhyan Balan And Anr on 29 September, 1999

27. The division bench of the Supreme Court in M/s.Harman Electronics (supra) differed with the earlier decision taken by another division bench in K.Bhaskaran (supra) with respect to the jurisdiction over the place of issuance of demand/legal notice, and held that the courts having jurisdiction over the place, where, the respondent/accused receives the legal notice and not the place of issuance of legal notice, would have jurisdiction to try the cases under Section 138 NI Act.
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 3240 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next