Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 19 (0.31 seconds)Section 139 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Section 138 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
Section 118 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 114 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 281 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Kusum Ingots And Alloys Ltd vs Pennar Peterson Securities Ltd. And Ors on 23 February, 2000
(d) that the payee or the holder in due course of the
cheque has made a demand for the payment of the
1 *Kusum Ingots & Alloys Ltd. Vs. Pennar Peterson Securities Ltd. AIR
2000 SC 954, Delivered by Honorable Division Bench of Justice K.T.Thomas
& Justice D.P.Mohapatra, Supreme Court of India on 30032011.*modified
in consonance with the amendments brought subsequent to the judgement
dated 23.02.2000 in the NI Act.
Rangappa vs Sri Mohan on 7 May, 2010
10.5 Also, in the case of Rangappa v. Sri Mohan3, it was held
that: