Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.28 seconds)Section 45 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Section 12 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Section 6 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Bhagwan Das & Ors vs State Of.U.P. & Ors on 26 February, 2010
17. In any case, it does not come on record that in
any of the the communications copy of the award or even
the basic details of the award were communicated or
sought to be communicated. As observed by the Supreme ?
Court in case of Bhagwan Das (supra), the claimant needs
to establish that he did not have knowledge of the
contents of the award. Thus, not the knowledge of the
award but knowledge of the contents of the award is of
significance. Under the circumstances, assertion of the
petitioners that they neither had actual nor constructive
notice of the award and that therefore their applications
for reference were not hit by limitation prescribed under
Section 18 of the Act must be accepted. After the
petitioners established the primary facts, the
respondents failed to establish that either notices were
duly served with contents of the award or that the
Page 11 of 12
HC-NIC Page 11 of 12 Created On Wed Mar 30 00:52:51 IST 2016
C/SCA/20071/2015 ORDER
claimants had constructive notice of the awards.
Section 11 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Premji Nathu vs State Of Gujarat & Anr on 9 April, 2012
In case of Premji Nathu Vs. State of
Gujarat & Ors., reported in (2012) 5 SCC,
page No.250.
Section 4 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
1