Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 34 (0.77 seconds)

Vijay Kumar Garg vs State Of Chhattisgarh 11 Wpc/1653/2016 ... on 8 October, 2018

2025.10.13 15:33:31 +0530 arguments addressed, documents and the material placed on record, as well as judicial dictates. Consequently, in the considered opinion of this Court the present revision petition deserves to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed. As a corollary, order dated 19.07.2024, passed by Ld. JMFC-05, Central, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in case bearing, 'Vijay Kumar v. Rajesh Kumar, Ct. Case No. 2485/2023', PS. Nabi Karim, dismissing the revisionist's application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C., while listing the matter for pre-summoning evidence on the revisionist's complaint under Section 200 Cr.P.C. is hereby upheld/affirmed. Apposite at this stage for this Court to further note that, though, it/this Court holds highest regard for the decisions relied upon by Ld. Counsel for the revisionist, however, the same would not, in the considered opinion of this Court, come to the aid/rescue of the case put forth by the revisionist in the manner as prayed for, as the facts and circumstances of the present case are clearly, distinguishable.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 42 - P K Mishra - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next