Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.25 seconds)Section 18 in The Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Dr. S.K. Kacker vs All India Institute Of Medical ... on 4 September, 1996
19. Further, the proposition that a
Government servant cannot hold lien over two
permanent posts, that is underscored in Dr.S.K.
Kacker vs. All India Institute of Medical Sciences
and others8, should be beyond quarrel, and the
provisions of Rules 19 and 20 of the KCSR in
detailing suspension and revival of lien have provided
for the play of this proposition. Therefore, reliance on
the aforesaid decision will not inure to the benefit of
the petitioner's benefit.
Sitikanatha Mishra vs Union Of India & Ors on 9 January, 2015
This proposition is once again
reiterated in Sitikanatha Mishra Vs. Union of
India Others7. A lien thus created is terminated or
discharged in terms of the relevant rules.
6 1992 Supp (1) SCC 524
7 (2015) 3 SCC 670
Section 19 in The Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Triveni Shankar Saxena vs State Of U.P. And Others on 20 December, 1991
18. This Court must observe that this inter
play between suspension of lien and revival of the
same ensures the guarantee of employment and the
consequential benefit to the concerned person and
that this guarantee is not jeopardized only because of
absence for a period either because of being sent on
deputation or appointment against a tenure post. The
Apex Court in Triveni Shankar Saxena Vs. State
of UP and Others6, while considering a similar
definition of the expression lien as in KCSR and
referring to the different contexts in which lien is
used at common law to denote a 'right to retain', has
reiterated that a person acquires a lien when he/she
is confirmed and made permanent against that
particular post.
1