Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.02 seconds)
Anant Raghunath Sandam And 18 Ors vs Vasundhara Dhananjay Dongre And 8 Ors on 12 March, 2024 cites

Yellapu Uma Maheswari & Anr vs Buddha Jagadheeswararao & Ors on 8 October, 2015

13 Mr. Patwardhan would further submit that reliance by Respondents on the so-called relinquishment deed allegedly executed by Petitioner is totally misplaced. That the said relinquishment deed is a forged document, the same is shown to have been executed on 16 November 1979, reflecting original Petitioner's name as Vasundhara Dhananjay Dongre when in fact her maiden name was Jayashree Moreshwar Paranjape and that she became 'Vasundhara' only after her marriage. Relying on the judgment of the Apex Court in Yellappa Uma Maheswari and Another vs. Buddha Jagadheeswararao and Anr. (2015) 16 SCC 787, Mr. Paranjape would submit that every relinquishment of immovable property made in writing requires compulsory registration. He would therefore submit that the so-called relinquishment deed dated katkam Page No. 11 of 24 12 March 2024 ::: Uploaded on - 12/03/2024 ::: Downloaded on - 13/03/2024 10:31:30 ::: k 12/24 903_wpl_23095.21_J_os(1).doc 16 November 1979 does not have any effect on the share of the original Petitioner.
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 139 - N V Ramana - Full Document

Kashish Park Realty Pvt. Ltd. And Anr vs The State Of Maharashtra And Ors on 11 December, 2020

Therefore condition No.(c) has rightly been deleted by communication dated 19 October 2013. The Competent Authority had committed an error in prescribing conditions for grant of certificate of deemed conveyance. Mere removal of those conditions from certificate would not amount to review of the order. Therefore, reliance of Mr. Patwardhan on judgment of this Court in Kashish Park Realty Pvt. Ltd. & another (supra) is totally misplaced.
Bombay High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 3 - A Prabhudessai - Full Document
1