Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.20 seconds)
Pune Municipal Corporation And Ors vs Tata Teleservices (Maharashtra) ... on 1 August, 2025 cites

Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation vs Gtl Infra. Ltd. & Ors. Etc on 16 December, 2016

8. However, all learned Counsel fairly submitted that they would not have any objection in furnishing copies of the Writ Petitions/Transfer Petitions/SLPs (if any) filed by their respective clients as sought by the learned Advocate General, which had fell for adjudication of the Supreme Court and disposed of by the Supreme Court in Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation (supra). Let such copies be furnished by such Petitioners within a period of ten days from the day a copy of this order is made available, to be submitted with the office of the Learned Advocate General.
Supreme Court of India Cites 31 - Cited by 56 - R Gogoi - Full Document

Gtl Infrastructure Limited vs The Nagpur Municipal Corporation on 29 July, 2019

6. Bare perusal of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court clearly shows that incorporation of Section 145-A of the Gujarat Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, clearly indicates that it is the occupier and not the owner of the land and building, who is liable to pay the tax. The provisions of Section 2(34-AA), Section 127(1)(c) and Section 145-A in the Gujarat Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, and its absence in the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, or the City of Nagpur Corporation Act or the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, in our view Page 10 of 13 Sajakali Jamadar ::: Uploaded on - 16/08/2025 ::: Downloaded on - 22/08/2025 21:57:19 ::: 5-IA-2055-2021 AND ORS (C).DOC would not make the ratio of the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court inapplicable to the present case. The matter is fully covered and is required to be dismissed.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1