Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 29 (0.30 seconds)Section 24 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Court Fees in Delhi
The Land Acquisition Act, 1894
Section 4 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Bhupesh Kumar Sharma And Ors. vs Manohar Kumari And Ors. on 23 January, 2007
39. The said decision also does not come to the help of the
appellant because there the claim was that defendant was
having no alienable interest in the suit property and the
plaintiffs were also having the ownership rights in the
property and I fail to understand as to how the said judgment
is applicable to the facts of the present case wherein as per
own case of the appellant, the plots in question were sold to
the respondents/defendants by third parties who were
allegedly having no right to sell the same to the respondents
herein.
Union Of India vs Pramod Gupta (D) By Lrs. & Ors on 7 September, 2005
40. Ld. counsel for the appellant has further relied on the
judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court titled Union of India
Vs. Pramod Gupta (D) by L.Rs and others reported as
AIR 2005 SC 3708 wherein it was held that award passed in
respect of neighbouring land or land in same village has
evidentiary value and another judgment of the Hon'ble
Supreme Court has been relied titled Ranvir Singh and
another Vs. Union of India reported as AIR 2005 SC 3467
wherein Hon'ble Supreme Court determined the criterias for
valuation of the land which has been acquired under the
31/47
Land Acquisition Act.
Ranvir Singh & Anr vs Union Of India on 7 September, 2005
In my considered opinion, there is no dispute about
the said proposition of law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme
Court in the said judgments but at the same time it is also
true that the standards and criterias and tests laid down for
the determination of the compensation of the acquired land
under the Land Acquisition Act are different from those as
laid down under the Court-fees Act and the Suits Valuation
Act.
Tara Devi vs Sri Thakur Radha Krishna Maharaj, ... on 10 August, 1987
43. But it was further held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court
in para 4 in the said judgment as under:
Kamaleshwar Kishore Singh vs Paras Nath Singh & Ors on 22 November, 2001
49. I have carefully gone through the judgment and in my
considered opinion the said judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme
Court of 2002 (Supra) rather goes against the contention
raised on behalf of the appellant on the ground as in para 8 of
the judgment Hon'ble Supreme Court held as follows: