Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 17 (0.21 seconds)

Md.Ibrahim & Ors vs State Of Bihar & Anr on 4 September, 2009

The order dated 23.08.2014 would show that the complainant adopted  his  pre­summoning  evidence  as  pre­charge evidence and   the   accused   persons   were   directed   to   cross­examine   the complainant. While the case was at this stage, ld. Trial Court CR No. 34/16 (8375/2016)                                           11.07.2017                 Page no. 3/11 observed   vide   order   dated   06.02.2016   that   there   was   no evidence of any witnesses regarding inducement by the accused persons and subsequent delivery of any property. Regarding the offence punishable U/Sec. 471 IPC, it was observed by ld. Trial Court that it was necessary for the complainant to prove that the Will was a forged document. Reliance was also placed on Mohd   Ibrahim   v.   State   of   Bihar,   (2009)   8   SCC   751. Observations were also made regarding applicability of Section 245(2) Cr.P.C, that is, discharge of accused without recording any pre­summoning evidence.
Supreme Court of India Cites 26 - Cited by 1195 - R V Raveendran - Full Document
1   2 Next