Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.29 seconds)
Balbir Singh Khokha vs State Of Haryana And Ors on 20 July, 2016 cites

State Of Tamil Nadu vs Thiru K.S. Murugesan And Ors on 28 February, 1995

Hence, the impugned order dated 28.03.2011 (Annexure P-18), 10 of 11 ::: Downloaded on - 24-07-2016 00:02:43 ::: CWP No.7162 of 2011 11 whereby the respondents have interfered with the seniority of the petitioner and placed him before respondent No.4 is liable to be set aside. This order has been passed on account of instructions dated 13.02.2006, which were issued on the basis of the judgment passed in Thiru K.S. Murugesan's case (supra).
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 59 - Full Document

Major General Narinder Singh Gill And ... vs State Of Punjab And Others on 24 July, 2013

At this stage, reference can be made to a judgment passed in Major Singh Gill's case (supra). In that case, charge-sheet was issued to the petitioner in the year 1975 and continued till 1989. The case for promotion was to be taken up for consideration w.e.f. 01.01.1985, for which, five years record prior to the date was to be taken into consideration. After completion of enquiry, no action had been taken against the petitioner till 1989 and it was tentatively decided to impose punishment of stoppage of one increment with cumulative effect. In the above facts, it was held that punishment, if awarded, would relate back to the date of the incident i.e. 1973 or 1975. For consideration of his case for promotion w.e.f. 01.01.1985, record of five years was required to be seen and this punishment, even if, awarded in the year 1989, would not make the petitioner ineligible for promotion w.e..f 01.01.1985. The aforesaid petition was allowed by this Court.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 4 - R S Malik - Full Document
1