Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (1.50 seconds)
Food Corporation Of India And Ors vs Jaswant Lal on 11 November, 2025 cites

State Of U.P.& Ors vs Ravindra Kumar Sharma & Ors on 3 February, 2016

i) Hon'ble The Supreme Court of India in State of Uttar Pradesh and others Vs. Dinesh Kumar Sharma and others; 2025(186) FLR 209 held that pension is not a charity or bounty; employees are entitled to receive pension as a matter of right. Pension claims, even if delayed, can be considered with arrears restricted to three years prior to filing the writ petition. Further that pension claims are recurring benefits, and delay in approaching the court does not extinguish entitlement. Arrears of pension can be restricted to three years prior to the date of filing the writ petition.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 73 - A Mishra - Full Document

Ram Kumar Bhadu And Others vs Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam ... on 11 July, 2013

iii) This Court in Ram Kumar and others Vs. Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. and others; 2006(3) S.C.T. 628 held that notice of instructions as to option to pension to the employee is must. In the absence of any material as to, notice to the employee, his claim to change of option to pension cannot be declined, subject however, he 7 of 9 ::: Downloaded on - 12-11-2025 21:04:59 ::: RSA-3878-2013 (O&M) -8- will have to deposit back the employer's contribution towards EPF with interest.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 1 - M M Bedi - Full Document

People Unions Of Civil Liberties Alld.& ... vs Union Of India & Others on 6 August, 2010

3. Issue regarding validity of EPS remained sub-judice and Hon'ble The Supreme Court finally upheld the Scheme in OTIS Elevator employees Unions & Ors v/s UOI 2003(4) SCT 935. Thereafter, the respondent submitted his option under EPS alongwith duly filled proforma on 21.04.2004 (Ex.P-17). He filled up proforma under EPS (Ex.P-18) dated 21.04.2004. The same was forwarded by Assistant Manager (Admin.) to Deputy Manager. On 27.01.2005 (Ex.P-20) Assistant Manager wrote to Deputy manager to settle the case of respondent regarding pension under EPS. On 26.05.2006 (Ex.P-5), request of plaintiff for grant of pension was declined. On 22.11.2006 (Ex.P-3) increment was granted to respondent w.e.f. 1989, instead of 1980 when it was due. On 19.12.2006 (Ex.P-4) pay of respondent was fixed but without grant of increment which was due in 1980. On 22.02.2007, he filed civil suit challenging both the orders dated 26.05.2006 and 22.11.2006 besides claiming interest on delayed payment of gratuity and leave encashment.
Allahabad High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1