Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.22 seconds)Section 47 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Noorduddin vs Dr. K.L. Anand on 6 October, 1994
In the aforesaid Supreme Court decision, reliance was placed upon an earlier decision of the Supreme Court (NOORDUDDIN v. Dr.K.L. ANAND). After making reference to various provisions, it was observed :
Shreenath & Another vs Rajesh & Others on 13 April, 1998
10. The scope of Order 21, Rules 97, 99 and 101 has been considered by the Supreme Court in the decision (SHREENATH AND ANOTHER v. RAJESH AND OTHERS). It has observed :
The Code Of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1956
Section 45 in The Indian Contract Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
The Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988
Elanthammal And Another vs Alagar And Another on 15 November, 2000
In 2001(1) CTC 287 (ELANTHAMMAL AND ANOTHER v. ALAGAR AND ANOTHER) after referring to the decision of the Supreme Court reported in 1998 SC 1827 (cited supra), it was indicated by a learned single Judge of this Court that third parties to suit claiming possession of immovable property can take recourse to the procedure contemplated under Order 21, Rule 97 and Rule 99 CPC by filing an application.
1