Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 20 (0.40 seconds)The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Section 37 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Section 8 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Section 16 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Anand Prakash And Anr. vs Assistant Registrar, Co-Operative ... on 27 January, 1966
17A. In my opinion, the impugned order is not an interim award. The terms "award" or "arbitral award" have not been defined in the General Clauses Act, 1897. In the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, though the term "arbitral award" has been defined but the definition is only an inclusive definition, that is to say, the arbitral award includes an interim award. It is also to be seen that the term "interim award" has not been defined in the Act. Therefore, definition of interim award is to be found elsewhere. Their Lordships in Uttam Singh Duggal v. Hindustan Steel Ltd. and in Anand Parkash v. Assistant Registrar, Co-operative Societies AIR 1968 Allahabad 22, held that an order in the nature of the impugned order cannot be termed as an interim award. I am in agreement with the observations in the aforesaid cases in holding that the impugned order is not an interim award.
Section 5 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
British Nationality Act, 1964
Uttam Singh Dugal And Co. Pvt. Ltd., New ... vs Hindustan Steel Ltd., Bhilai Steel ... on 30 September, 1981
17A. In my opinion, the impugned order is not an interim award. The terms "award" or "arbitral award" have not been defined in the General Clauses Act, 1897. In the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, though the term "arbitral award" has been defined but the definition is only an inclusive definition, that is to say, the arbitral award includes an interim award. It is also to be seen that the term "interim award" has not been defined in the Act. Therefore, definition of interim award is to be found elsewhere. Their Lordships in Uttam Singh Duggal v. Hindustan Steel Ltd. and in Anand Parkash v. Assistant Registrar, Co-operative Societies AIR 1968 Allahabad 22, held that an order in the nature of the impugned order cannot be termed as an interim award. I am in agreement with the observations in the aforesaid cases in holding that the impugned order is not an interim award.