Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (5.29 seconds)Mahendra Singh vs State Of M.P on 5 April, 2007
In Mahendra Singh (supra), it is held:-
Mohammed Alam Ibrahim Shaikh vs S.G. Suryavanshi, Dy. Commissioner Of ... on 10 August, 2005
The action against respondent No. 1 as
evident, is taken not under sub-section (1) of
Section 55, but under sub-section (2) of Section 55
of Adhiniyam 1972. Therefore, incumbent it was
upon the Director to have established the
misconduct, which means wrong or improper
conduct i.e. conduct in violation of a definite rule of
action. It ordinarily means failure to do what is
required of a person to be done. (Please see Shaikh
Mohammad Vs. G.G. In council : AIR 1954 Nagpur 337).
Section 22 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 379 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
1