cites: 199332896

Satender Kumar Antil vs Central Bureau Of Investigation on 11 July, 2022

11. Reference has also been made to the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. C.B.I. and another in Misc. Application No. 2034/22 and the following para has been highlighted by the learned counsel for the petitioners:-

Supreme Court of India Cites 131 - Cited by 19037 - M M Sundresh - Full Document

State Of Madhya Pradesh vs Kajad on 6 September, 2001

In the case of State of M.P. Vs. Kajad (supra), it has been held as follows:-

Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 330 - Full Document

The Special Courts Act, 1979

Union of India - Act Cites 0 - Cited by 6140

Section 30 in The Railways Act, 1989 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 52

Section 37 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 29968

Satendra Kumar Antil vs C.B.I. And Another on 1 July, 2021

Mr. Gadodia has also submitted that the petitioners were not arrested during investigation and he has placed reliance in the case of Satyendra Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and Anr. reported in 2022 (10) SCC 51, Siddharth Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors. reported in 2022(1) SCC 676 and the order dated 21.3.2023 passed in Misc.

Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 17536 - Full Document

Hari Singh Mann vs Harbhajan Singh Bajwa & Ors on 1 November, 2000

"8.It has further to be noted that the factum of the rejection of his earlier bail application bearing Miscellaneous Case No. 2052 of 2000 on 5-6-2000 has not been denied by the respondent. It is true that successive bail applications are permissible under the changed circumstances. But without the change in the circumstances the second application would be deemed to be seeking review of the earlier judgment which is not permissible under criminal law as has been held by this Court in Hari Singh Mann v. Harbhajan Singh Bajwa and various other judgments".

Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 441 - Full Document

Section 420 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 395484

Mahdoom Bava vs Central Bureau Of Investigation on 20 March, 2023

"(v) Mr. Siddharth Aggarwal, learned senior Counsel seeks to bring to our notice an order passed yesterday by a Bench of this Court in Criminal Appeal No. 853/2023, Mahdoom Bava vs. Central Bureau of Investigation where the issue qua how the Court deals with anticipatory bail where a person has cooperated with investigation but never arrested and charge sheet has been filed has been dealt with. He referred to the observations in para 10 and 12 as under :

Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 4 - Cited by 68 - V Ramasubramanian - Full Document

Section 468 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 195871

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results