Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.30 seconds)

State Of Maharashtra & Anr vs Suresh Pandurang Darvakar on 13 April, 2006

7 The next demand was that furlough and parole leaves should not be rejected by the D.I.G. / Divisional Commissioner and stringent conditions should not be imposed and the prisoners should be released on furlough or parole leave on personal bonds. Grant of parole or furlough would depend on the police report, on the facts and circumstances of each case and conduct of the prisoners in the prison, hence, it is not possible for the D.I.G. / Divisional Commissioner to grant all 5 of 12 ::: Uploaded on - 30/08/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 31/08/2016 00:01:27 ::: jdk 6 3.crwp.2446.16.j.doc parole or furlough leaves. Imposing conditions while granting furlough / parole again depends on fact and circumstances of the case and the record of the prisoner. As far as the demand for release of prisoner on personal bond is concerned, the Supreme Court in the case of State of Maharashtra and Another Vs. Suresh Pandurang Darvakar reported in (2006) 4 S.C.C. 776 has disapproved the release of prisoners without surety.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 51 - A Pasayat - Full Document
1