Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.19 seconds)The Indian Penal Code, 1860
The Electricity Act, 2003
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 379 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
State Of Gujarat vs Kishanbhai on 7 January, 2014
31. Before parting, I find it necessary that a finding regarding the
conduct of investigation needs to be given in this case in view of the
judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in State of Gujarat Vs. Kishanbhai,
etc. 2014(1) SCALE 177 wherein it is held that:
Pradeep Narayan Madgonkar Etc. Etc. vs State Of Maharashtra on 12 May, 1995
24. Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Pradeep Narayan v. State of
Maharashtra, AIR 1995 SC 1930 has observed as under:
Indeed, the evidence of the officials (police) witnesses cannot be
FIR No.741/07 12 of 20
P.S. Welcome
discarded merely on the ground that they belong to the police force and
are, either interested in the investigating or the prosecuting agency but
prudence dictates that their evidence needs to be subjected to strict
scrutiny and as far as possible corroboration of their evidence in material
particulars should be sought. Their desire to see success of the case based
on their investigation required greater care to appreciate their testimony.
We cannot lose sight of the fact that these police officials did not join any
independent witnesses of the locality and made an attempt to create an
impression on the Court that PW2 and PW5 were witnesses of locality
and were independent....
1