Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.32 seconds)
Shri Anil Singh vs Union Of India Through on 9 August, 2011 cites

Shri Lakhi Ram vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 5 October, 2007

10. Learned counsel for applicant has placed reliance upon the judgment rendered by the High Court of Delhi in Shri Lakhi Ram v. Union of India & others (WP (C) No.6070 of 2006) decided on 5.10.2007 wherein it has been held that person who has attained temporary status cannot be terminated without applying full procedure as described in the D & A Rules, thereby giving reasonable opportunity to the employee to meet the accusations of indecent behavior/misbehavour in a departmental enquiry.
Delhi High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 17 - V Sanghi - Full Document

Pinaki Chatterjee & Ors vs Union Of India & Ors on 31 March, 2009

13. Learned counsel for respondents has also placed reliance upon the decision of the Apex Court in Pinaki Chatterjee & others v. Union of India & others (2009) 5 SCC 193 to contend that the selection of the applicant was not made in conformity with the constitutional scheme by advertising the post and making selection from open market. It is contended that Bungalow Khallasies are engaged on the recommendations of a person to whom such services are to be provided. Thus, according to the respondents, the applicant is not legally right to hold the post and no mandamus can be issued to the respondents to engage the applicant.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 36 - S B Sinha - Full Document
1