Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 26 (0.25 seconds)Section 81 in The Indian Trusts Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
Section 4 in The Indian Trusts Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
Section 2 in The Indian Trusts Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
The Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988
Section 94 in The Indian Trusts Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
Section 2 in The Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Section 3 in The Indian Trusts Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
Section 3 in The Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Kathoom Bivi Ammal vs S. Mohamad Alias Sheik Mohamad And Ors. on 2 March, 1990
We, therefore, hold that the decision in Kathoom Bivi Animal v. S. Mohamad alias Sheik Mohamad (1990)1 L.W. 284, in so far as it held that sham and nominal transactions are also covered by the provisions of the Act, is not correct.