Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 16 (0.36 seconds)Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Anjana Chari S N vs The Medical Counselling Committee ... on 30 March, 2022
(h) In a similar situation involving additional seats
in NEET-PG, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in
Anjana Chari S.N. v. The Medical
Counselling Committee (W.P.
No.174/2022 (C), disposed of on
31.03.2022) permitted special counselling for
students who had joined in round 2, either
under the State quota or the All India Quota,
without imposing any financial penalties, and
thereafter allowed a mop-up round for eligible
candidates. In the present case, the newly
added 443 seats were not available for option
to candidates in Rounds 1 and 2. Hence, they
were provided an opportunity to exercise their
options among the 443 seats in the 9 colleges.
This exercise is in conformity with the
procedure adopted by the Hon'ble Supreme
Court in the judgment referred to supra.
Nihila P.P. vs The Medical Counseling Committee (Mcc) on 16 December, 2021
32. While noting the decisions of the Supreme
Court in the case of Neelu Arora (supra); Supreet Batra
and Others Vs. Union of India and Others17; Nihila
P.P. (supra) and in Education Promotion Society for
India Vs. Union of India18, the Supreme Court in the
case of Dr. Astha Goel and others v. Medical
Counseling Committee & others19, considered the
admission process for NEET-PG-2021. The submission
before the Supreme Court was that a direction be issued
16
(2003) 3 SCC 366
17
(2003) 3 SCC 370
18
(2019) 7 SCC 38
19
(2022) 19 SCC 695
77
WP No. 31934 of 2025 C/W WP No. 32428 of 2025,
WP No.32391/2025, WP No.32510/2025 &
WP No.32519/2025
to the respondents to conduct a special stray round of
counseling with respect to the seats which remained
vacant. After considering the respective submissions and
the facts and circumstances of the case, the Supreme
Court in the case of Astha Goel has observed as follows:-
Dar-Us-Slam Educational Trust vs Medical Council Of India on 8 May, 2017
30. Learned counsel for the NMC has referred to a
letter dated 24.07.2023 on the subject of online
counseling for NEET-PG courses in line with the decision of
the Supreme Court in the Dar-us-Slam Educational
Trust Vs. Medical Council of India15 (MCI), which
directed conducting counseling in online mode by all the
State Counseling Agencies for all rounds including stray
vacancy round in private medical colleges from the
Academic Year:2023-2024. It is stated in the letter that,
it will help in tackling the issue of seat blocking and
complaints/court cases relating to counseling.
Ms. Neelu Arora And Anr. vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 24 January, 2003
32. While noting the decisions of the Supreme
Court in the case of Neelu Arora (supra); Supreet Batra
and Others Vs. Union of India and Others17; Nihila
P.P. (supra) and in Education Promotion Society for
India Vs. Union of India18, the Supreme Court in the
case of Dr. Astha Goel and others v. Medical
Counseling Committee & others19, considered the
admission process for NEET-PG-2021. The submission
before the Supreme Court was that a direction be issued
16
(2003) 3 SCC 366
17
(2003) 3 SCC 370
18
(2019) 7 SCC 38
19
(2022) 19 SCC 695
77
WP No. 31934 of 2025 C/W WP No. 32428 of 2025,
WP No.32391/2025, WP No.32510/2025 &
WP No.32519/2025
to the respondents to conduct a special stray round of
counseling with respect to the seats which remained
vacant. After considering the respective submissions and
the facts and circumstances of the case, the Supreme
Court in the case of Astha Goel has observed as follows:-
Supreet Batra & Ors vs Union Of India & Ors on 27 January, 2003
32. While noting the decisions of the Supreme
Court in the case of Neelu Arora (supra); Supreet Batra
and Others Vs. Union of India and Others17; Nihila
P.P. (supra) and in Education Promotion Society for
India Vs. Union of India18, the Supreme Court in the
case of Dr. Astha Goel and others v. Medical
Counseling Committee & others19, considered the
admission process for NEET-PG-2021. The submission
before the Supreme Court was that a direction be issued
16
(2003) 3 SCC 366
17
(2003) 3 SCC 370
18
(2019) 7 SCC 38
19
(2022) 19 SCC 695
77
WP No. 31934 of 2025 C/W WP No. 32428 of 2025,
WP No.32391/2025, WP No.32510/2025 &
WP No.32519/2025
to the respondents to conduct a special stray round of
counseling with respect to the seats which remained
vacant. After considering the respective submissions and
the facts and circumstances of the case, the Supreme
Court in the case of Astha Goel has observed as follows:-
63 Moons Technologies Ltd (Formerly ... vs Union Of India on 30 April, 2019
32. While noting the decisions of the Supreme
Court in the case of Neelu Arora (supra); Supreet Batra
and Others Vs. Union of India and Others17; Nihila
P.P. (supra) and in Education Promotion Society for
India Vs. Union of India18, the Supreme Court in the
case of Dr. Astha Goel and others v. Medical
Counseling Committee & others19, considered the
admission process for NEET-PG-2021. The submission
before the Supreme Court was that a direction be issued
16
(2003) 3 SCC 366
17
(2003) 3 SCC 370
18
(2019) 7 SCC 38
19
(2022) 19 SCC 695
77
WP No. 31934 of 2025 C/W WP No. 32428 of 2025,
WP No.32391/2025, WP No.32510/2025 &
WP No.32519/2025
to the respondents to conduct a special stray round of
counseling with respect to the seats which remained
vacant. After considering the respective submissions and
the facts and circumstances of the case, the Supreme
Court in the case of Astha Goel has observed as follows:-