Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 15 (0.30 seconds)Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Contempt Of Courts Act, 1971
Article 12 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Chief Justice Of A.P. & Anr vs L.V.A. Dikshitulu & Ors on 12 September, 1978
If the appointment of the respondent was wholly illegal and without
jurisdiction and such an appointment had been obtained by practising fraud
upon the appellant, the same was a nullity. We are, however, not oblivious
of the fact that the same attained finality in view of the fact that the writ
petition of the said Vidhya Devi was dismissed. Despite the same, the
principles of res judicata shall not apply in a case of this nature. It is well-
known that where an order is passed by an authority which lacks inherent
jurisdiction, the principles of res judicata would not apply, the same being
nullity. [See Chief Justice of A.P. v. L.V.A. Dixitulu, 1979 (2) SCC 34 and
Union of India v. Pramod Gupta (D) By LRs. and Ors. (2005) 12 SCC 1]
Moreover, any appointment in violation of the constitutional scheme
would also be rendered a nullity.
Union Of India vs Pramod Gupta (D) By Lrs. & Ors on 7 September, 2005
If the appointment of the respondent was wholly illegal and without
jurisdiction and such an appointment had been obtained by practising fraud
upon the appellant, the same was a nullity. We are, however, not oblivious
of the fact that the same attained finality in view of the fact that the writ
petition of the said Vidhya Devi was dismissed. Despite the same, the
principles of res judicata shall not apply in a case of this nature. It is well-
known that where an order is passed by an authority which lacks inherent
jurisdiction, the principles of res judicata would not apply, the same being
nullity. [See Chief Justice of A.P. v. L.V.A. Dixitulu, 1979 (2) SCC 34 and
Union of India v. Pramod Gupta (D) By LRs. and Ors. (2005) 12 SCC 1]
Moreover, any appointment in violation of the constitutional scheme
would also be rendered a nullity.
Secretary, State Of Karnataka And ... vs Umadevi And Others on 10 April, 2006
[See Secretary, State of Karnataka & Ors.
v. Umadevi & Ors. (2006) 4 SCC 1, Indian Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v.
Workman, Indian Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Ltd. 2006 (12) SCALE 1,
Municipal Corporation, Jabalpur v. Om Prakash Dubey [2006 (13) SCALE
266].National Fertilizers Ltd. and Ors. v. Somvir Singh (2006) 6 SCALE
101 and Ranjodh Singh (supra)]
The question, therefore, should have been considered by the learned
Single Judge having regard to the aforementioned legal position.
Punjab Water Supply & Sewerage Board vs Ranjodh Singh & Ors on 6 December, 2006
[See Secretary, State of Karnataka & Ors.
v. Umadevi & Ors. (2006) 4 SCC 1, Indian Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v.
Workman, Indian Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Ltd. 2006 (12) SCALE 1,
Municipal Corporation, Jabalpur v. Om Prakash Dubey [2006 (13) SCALE
266].National Fertilizers Ltd. and Ors. v. Somvir Singh (2006) 6 SCALE
101 and Ranjodh Singh (supra)]
The question, therefore, should have been considered by the learned
Single Judge having regard to the aforementioned legal position.
Municipal Corporation, Jabalpur vs Om Prakash Dubey on 5 December, 2006
[See Secretary, State of Karnataka & Ors.
v. Umadevi & Ors. (2006) 4 SCC 1, Indian Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v.
Workman, Indian Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Ltd. 2006 (12) SCALE 1,
Municipal Corporation, Jabalpur v. Om Prakash Dubey [2006 (13) SCALE
266].National Fertilizers Ltd. and Ors. v. Somvir Singh (2006) 6 SCALE
101 and Ranjodh Singh (supra)]
The question, therefore, should have been considered by the learned
Single Judge having regard to the aforementioned legal position.
National Fertilizers Ltd. & Ors vs Somvir Singh on 12 May, 2006
[See Secretary, State of Karnataka & Ors.
v. Umadevi & Ors. (2006) 4 SCC 1, Indian Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v.
Workman, Indian Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Ltd. 2006 (12) SCALE 1,
Municipal Corporation, Jabalpur v. Om Prakash Dubey [2006 (13) SCALE
266].National Fertilizers Ltd. and Ors. v. Somvir Singh (2006) 6 SCALE
101 and Ranjodh Singh (supra)]
The question, therefore, should have been considered by the learned
Single Judge having regard to the aforementioned legal position.