Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 30 (0.25 seconds)Section 107 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Madhu Limaye vs Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Monghyr & ... on 28 October, 1970
such other details of the petitioners and the number of the
crimes in which they are allegedly involved. The substance of
the information received by the Sub Divisional Magistrate
which gives rise to the apprehension regarding the imminent
breach of peace and disturbance of public tranquility are not
stated in any of these orders as held in paragraph 35 of the
Constitution Bench decision in the case Madhu Limaye and
another v. Sub Divisional Magistrate, Monghyr & others
reported in AIR 1971 SC 2486, the aspect whether the
provisions are destructive of freedom of the individual
guaranteed by Art. 19(1)(a)(b)(c) and (d) which have been
under clause (2) to (5) of that Article is a very important
aspect. In order to ensure full adherence to the fundamental
right conferred in Part-III of the Constitution of India, there
has to be full compliance of the procedure given in the statute
and there cannot be any departure from the procedure to any
substantial extent and this is very salutary because liberty of
the person is involved and as held by the Constitution Bench of
the Supreme Court that the law is rightly solicitous, that this
liberty should only be curtailed according to prescribed
::23::
Section 109 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 107 in The Karnataka Police Act, 1963. [Entire Act]
M.V.Santhosh vs State Of Kerala on 15 July, 2013
As the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners in
these cases submitted that these cases are covered by the
judgment of this Court in the case between Santhosh v. State
of Kerala in Crl.M.C.No.3207/2013 and connected cases,
reported in 2014 (3) KLT 837=2014 (3) ILR (Ker.) 993, these
cases are taken up for consideration together.