Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.60 seconds)

S.B. Bhattacharjee vs S.D. Majumdar & Ors on 15 May, 2007

In the matter of promotion right to be considered on fair and equitable basis and creation of promotional avenues are must, as ruled by the Apex Court in S.B. Bhatacharjee v. S.D. Mazumdar, 2008 (1) SCC (L&S) 21 and in F.C.I. v. P.D. Bansal, 2008 (2) SCALE 205. In the matter of promotion a right to be considered implies that promotional chances cannot be foreclosed forever.
Supreme Court of India Cites 17 - Cited by 116 - S B Sinha - Full Document

??`?W??Ul????O???M?.??P? ?;J ... vs ? ?/?F??G;?S? ... on 27 August, 2008

In the matter of promotion right to be considered on fair and equitable basis and creation of promotional avenues are must, as ruled by the Apex Court in S.B. Bhatacharjee v. S.D. Mazumdar, 2008 (1) SCC (L&S) 21 and in F.C.I. v. P.D. Bansal, 2008 (2) SCALE 205. In the matter of promotion a right to be considered implies that promotional chances cannot be foreclosed forever.
Gujarat High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 90 - A Kureshi - Full Document

Dwarka Prasad And Others vs Union Of India And Others on 28 July, 2003

10. On careful consideration of the rival contentions of the parties, as ruled by the Apex Court in Dwarka Prasad (supra) that while fixing the quota relevant factors have to be considered within the prerogative of the Government. However, such fixation would inter alia consider the cadre strength in feeder quota also. In the instant case whereas as per the sanctioned strength of Inspectors 92 promotional posts are available to UDCs whereas their strength is only 87, whereas the strength of Sub Inspectors is 160 and for them only 57 promotional posts are made available.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 67 - Full Document
1