Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.41 seconds)The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
M/S. Revajeetu Builders & Developers vs M/S. Narayanaswamy & Sons & Ors on 9 October, 2009
In such case, the petitioner is not entitled to claim the
relief in the present case and the Hon'ble Supreme Court in
Revajeetu Builders and Developers v. Narayanaswamy & Sons
and others2 held that to decide the scope of proviso to Order VI Rule
17 of the Code, laid down certain guidelines for granting or denying
relief under Order VI Rule 17 of CPC viz., as follows:
J.Samuel & Ors vs Gattu Mhesh & Ors on 16 January, 2012
In
view of the principles laid down in the above said judgments, it is
difficult to accept the contention of the petitioner at this stage based
on the principle laid down in Peruri Manikyamba1. Hence, I find no
illegality in the order impugned, warranting interference of this Court
by exercising power under Article 227 of the Constitution of India
since power is limited to keep the subordinate Courts under the
control of High Court to act within their bounds of jurisdictional
limits and not to allow them to transgress from their jurisdictional
limits, but not otherwise. Therefore, the present revision is liable to be
dismissed.
1