Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.20 seconds)
Pritam Singh And Ors. vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 31 August, 2001 cites

V.K. Sharma vs Union Of India & Ors.[Overruled] on 28 March, 2000

4. The other case cited by the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the applicants is V.N. Sharma v. Union of India and Ors. in OA No. 455/1996 decided by the Jaipur Bench on 12.3.1998, on review of the orders earlier passed on 28.1.1997. In the order in review, the implications of Para 2.2 of Record Note circulated vide Railway Board's letter No. (NG) I -75 PMI/264 dated 25.1.1976 had been extensively deliberated upon and it was held that the respondents would not be justified in declaring the applicant as failed and not eligible for inclusion in the selection panel for the post of CTI in grade Rs, 2000-3200, on the ground that the applicant had failed to secure the minimum 60% marks in the professional ability judged on the basis of viva-voce. The respondents were directed to assume that the applicant has secured 60% marks in case his working on ad hoc basis was found satisfactory based on his record of service.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 18 - Full Document

Simranjit Singh Mann vs Union Of India And Another on 16 September, 1992

6. Perusal of these cases brings out one fact clearly i.e. that the selections to the posts, not falling in 'safety categories', the ratio of the Apex Court's decision in the case of R.C. Srivastava has been followed, whereas for 'safety category posts' the facts have been distinguished and ratio of Mann Kumar's case has been followed. However, a notable feature which has arisen is that differing views have been laken by the Benches (both sitting at Jaipur) on the question whether provisions of Para 2.2 of Record Note of the circular of 1976 will have application where the mode of selection adopted is only viva-voce and no written test is held. In OA No. 455/1996 it has been held that Railway Board's instructions under Para 2.2 of the Record Note shall apply even where mode of selection is only viva-voce. In OA No. 260/2000, decided later, it has been held specifically that these instructions shall not apply at all to selections where the mode of selection is only viva-voce.
Supreme Court of India Cites 22 - Cited by 84 - A M Ahmadi - Full Document
1