Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.35 seconds)
Ravindra Kumar Varlyani vs Balvinder Singh @ Gaggi on 15 November, 2016 cites

Surya Dev Rai vs Ram Chander Rai & Ors on 7 August, 2003

7. All that apart, in the matters of Surya Dev Rai v. Ram Chander Rai (2003) 6 SCC 675, Shalini Shyam Shetty v. Rajendra Shankar Patil (2010) 8 SCC 329 and Sameer Suresh Gupta through PA Holder v. Rahul Kumar Agarwal (2013) 9 SCC 374 it has been consistently held by the Apex Court that supervisory or certiorari jurisdiction is not available to correct mere errors of fact or of law unless the following requirements are satisfied :
Supreme Court of India Cites 25 - Cited by 3621 - R C Lahoti - Full Document

Shalini Shyam Shetty & Anr vs Rajendra Shankar Patil on 23 July, 2010

7. All that apart, in the matters of Surya Dev Rai v. Ram Chander Rai (2003) 6 SCC 675, Shalini Shyam Shetty v. Rajendra Shankar Patil (2010) 8 SCC 329 and Sameer Suresh Gupta through PA Holder v. Rahul Kumar Agarwal (2013) 9 SCC 374 it has been consistently held by the Apex Court that supervisory or certiorari jurisdiction is not available to correct mere errors of fact or of law unless the following requirements are satisfied :
Supreme Court of India Cites 48 - Cited by 2466 - Full Document
1