Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 21 (0.35 seconds)
Lanco Infratech Ltd. vs Hindustan Construction Company Ltd. on 23 September, 2016 cites

Intertoll Ics Cecons O And M Company P. ... vs National Highways Authority Of India on 16 January, 2006

18. Turning to the decisions cited by learned counsel for HCCL, in Baker Hughes Singapore Pte. v. Shiv-Vani Oil and Gas Exploration Services Ltd. (supra), the Bombay High Court noticed the decision of this Court in Intertoll ICS Cecons v. National Highways Authority of India (supra) and distinguished it on the basis that what was claimed in the proceedings was not speculative in nature. The following passage in Baker Hughes Singapore Pte. (supra) makes the position clear:
Delhi High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 5 - A K Sikri - Full Document

Union Of India vs Raman Iron Foundry on 12 March, 1974

15.6 As noticed in Intertoll ICS Cecons v. National Highways Authority of India (supra), while the decision in Union of India v. Raman Iron Foundry (supra) was overruled subsequently in H. M. Kamaluddin Ansari & Co. v. Union of India (1983) 4 SCC 417 on the point that the clause in the contract applied to the claim itself and not only to an amount due, the decision in Arb. A. (Comm.) 30 of 2016 Page 14 of 24 Union of India v. Raman Iron Foundry (supra) is still good law as regards the nature of the claim for damages.
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 380 - P N Bhagwati - Full Document
1   2 3 Next