Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.32 seconds)Section 76 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 74 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 1 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Buchibai vs Nagpur University. on 24 August, 1945
"Statement recorded or orders passed by the Income-tax Officers are public documents under Section 74. Under Section 76 it is not necessary that the public generally must have a right to inspect. It is sufficient if there is any single person who has a right to inspect". (Vide : Buchibai v. Nagpur University AIR 1946 Nag 377).
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
A.K. Kaderkutty vs Agricultural Income-Tax Officer, ... on 16 August, 1960
Similarly, it is held in Kaderkutty v. Agricultural Income-tax Officer, Tellicherry that the records in the assessment file constitute public documents within the meaning of Section 74 as forming the acts or records of the acts of a public officer or of an official body.
The Indian Majority Act, 1875
Smt. Kamini & Others vs State Of U.P. & Another on 17 January, 2014
10. The learned counsel for revisionist has also placed reliance upon a criminal revision No. 258 of 2007 filed by wife in Kamini and others Vs. State of U.P. and another, 2014 (1) ACR 409, which has been dismissed by this Court. The relied upon judgment does not help the revisionist as in that case the husband has been able to prove before the trial Court that not only the wife had been living in adultery but she had deserted the matrimonial home on her own free will. The facts of the present case are different. Here, the wife has been found by the learned trial Court entitled to get maintenance amount from the revisionist in as much as the revisionist harassed her and is not ready to maintain her. The learned trial Court has also held that admittedly the revisionist is living separately from opposite party No. 2 in House No. CL 13 and opposite party No. 2 is living in the house No. CL 14 of revisionist in which earlier he was residing.
1