Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (1.48 seconds)

Deepak Kumar And Ors. vs District And Sessions Judge, Delhi And ... on 12 September, 2012

In Pappu Ram Meena & Others v. DSSSB (WP(C) No.6872/2013, which was also disposed of along with the Writ Petition of Ravindra Devi (supra) by the same common order dated 27.11.2013, the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi, though held that "thus, as far as this Court is concerned, till it holds the field, the decision of O.A.No.4142/2013 and batch 8 the Full Bench in Deepak Kumar's Case would hold the field and would have to be enforced", and allowed, however, dismissed the Writ Petition of Pappu Ram Meena (supra) on the ground of delay and latches by holding that no justifiable reasons were given for the delay in filing the Writ Petition, though their OA was dismissed one year nine months prior to the filing of the Writ Petition.
Delhi High Court Cites 63 - Cited by 53 - S R Bhat - Full Document

Ms. Seema vs Delhi Subordinate Selection Board ... on 20 May, 2014

6.3 As far as limitation is concerned, Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in Ms. Nirmala's case (supra) has already set aside the order of this Tribunal dismissing a similar O.A. on the grounds of limitation. Thus, this issue stands settled. Since the result of the ST category has still not been declared by the respondents, the question of limitation in this case does not arise.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 10 - Cited by 3 - Full Document

Ms. Manita Rani vs Delhi Subordinate Services Selection ... on 29 July, 2015

In the circumstances and for the aforesaid reasons, the aforesaid OAs are allowed and the respondents are directed to extend the benefit of the Judgement of this Tribunal in the case of Ms. Rajni Meena (supra) to the applicants and to pass the O.A.No.4142/2013 and batch 9 appropriate consequential orders within sixty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 6 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1