Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.24 seconds)

U.T. Chandigarh Administration & Anr vs Amarjeet Singh And Ors on 17 March, 2009

We find that the petitioner has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court against the show cause notice. Since the petitioner has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court without permitting the Market Committee to pass an order, we dispose of the present writ petition with direction to the respondents to pass a speaking order pursuant to the show cause notice issued in the light of the Supreme Court judgment in Amarjeet Singh's case (supra) and Vinod Mittal's case (supra). If any amount is due and payable, the same shall be communicated to the petitioner within two months of the receipt of the certified copy of the order after providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner in accordance with law. The parties shall be at liberty to avail their remedy in accordance with law thereafter.
Supreme Court of India Cites 18 - Cited by 277 - R V Raveendran - Full Document

Haryana Urban Development Authority & ... vs Vinod Mittal & Others on 16 October, 2012

We find that the petitioner has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court against the show cause notice. Since the petitioner has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court without permitting the Market Committee to pass an order, we dispose of the present writ petition with direction to the respondents to pass a speaking order pursuant to the show cause notice issued in the light of the Supreme Court judgment in Amarjeet Singh's case (supra) and Vinod Mittal's case (supra). If any amount is due and payable, the same shall be communicated to the petitioner within two months of the receipt of the certified copy of the order after providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner in accordance with law. The parties shall be at liberty to avail their remedy in accordance with law thereafter.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 57 - Cited by 26 - H Gupta - Full Document
1