Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.22 seconds)
Suketu Amratlal Desai vs State Of Gujarat on 22 March, 2018 cites

Surendranagar Dist.Panchayat & vs Umarkhan Alikhan Malek & 2 on 29 March, 2016

12. In case of Surendranagar Dist. Panchayat and Anr. v.   Umarkhan Alikhan Malek and ors.,  Division Bench of this   Court   in   its   judgment   dated   29.03.2016   rendered   in   Letters   Patent   Appeal   No.2047   of   2004,   considered   the   issue where the employee had sought pensionary benefits   having   worked  from   the   years   1978  to   1991.   The  learned   Single Judge applying the formula of section 25B of the   Industrial Disputes Act held that the employee had put in   continuous   service   for   more   than   10   years   as   a   daily   wager.   He   was   entitled   to   benefit   of   Government   Resolution   dated   17.10.1988   including   the   benefits   of   pension. The administration had merely contended that the   workman had not put in actual 10 years of service after   regularization before he can seek pensionary benefits.
Gujarat High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 56 - A S Dave - Full Document

State Of Gujarat vs Mahendrakumar Bhagvandas & Anr. Etc. on 14 May, 2015

17. The first and foremost reason being that the  clarification   /   decision   declared   by   the  respondents   vide   G.R.dated   24.3.2006,   so   far   as  it is contrary to the above quoted observation in  the two decisions in case of State of Gujarat &  Anr. v.   Mahendrakumar   Bhagvandas & Anr.(Supra)  and   Executive   Engineer   Panchayat   Department   v.  S.J.Bhedi   (Supra),   cannot   be   sustained.   Such  instructions   cannot   operate,   cannot   prevail   and  Court   would   not   recognise   and   approve   such  instructions or decision.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 280 - Full Document
1