Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.41 seconds)

Himatlal Ratilal Rajyagor vs The State Of Gujarat And Ors. on 13 October, 1969

9. The learned counsel Shri Mohanty has also contended that the order dated 5.9.2001 was passed on an application filed by four accused persons namely, Rajat, Hanish, Mahadev and Turam under Section 173(8), Cr.P.C. for directing the C.B.I, for further investigation for preparing and providing the plan of the scene of occurrence and stay further proceeding whereas the present revision as well as the Crl. Misc. Case No. 9676/ 2001 have been filed by 14 accused persons challenging the impugned order and that being so, they are not maintainable as no prayer was made by the rest of the ten accused persons in the Court below. In this regard, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners referred to 1971 Crl.L.J. 165 (Vol. 77 CN 54) (Himatlal Ratilal Rajyagor v. State of Gujarat and Ors.) wherein the following view has been taken':
Gujarat High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 2 - Full Document
1