Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 21 (0.45 seconds)Section 8 in The Right to Information Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
Centrlal Board Of Sec.Education & Anr vs Aditya Bandopadhyay & Ors on 9 August, 2011
In Central Board of Secondary Education v Aditya Bandopadhyay
(supra), the Supreme Court elaborated the duties of a fiduciary, and provided
as follows:
Section 22 in The Right to Information Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
The Official Secrets Act, 1923
Union Of India vs Subhash Chndra Agrawal on 17 January, 2019
In CPIO, Supreme Court of India v. Subhash Chandra Agarwal,
(2020) 5 SCC 481, the Supreme Court, while explaining the ambit of a
fiduciary relationship, provided as follows:
Reserve Bank Of India vs Jayantilal N. Mistry on 16 December, 2015
24. Flowing from the observations of the Supreme Court in CPIO,
Supreme Court v. Subhash Chandra Agarwal, this Court notes that to
establish a relationship of a fiduciary and beneficiary between two persons,
whether it be voluntary, involuntary, formal or informal, it has to satisfy the
test of four rules and duties as established in the Reserve Bank of India v.
Jayantilal N. Mistry, (2016) 3 SCC 525, which are the No Conflict Rule, No
Profit Rule, Undivided Loyalty Rule and the Duty of Confidentiality. In the
present case, to examine the relationship between the Solicitor General of
India and the Union of India and other Union Ministries, it is important to
peruse the rules for engagement of a Law Officer of the Union of India,
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed By:HARIOM
SINGH KIRMOLIYA
Signing Date:22.12.2023
19:03:13 W.P.(C) 4288/2012 Page 19 of 23
namely the Law Officer (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1987. Rule 5 of the
same states as follows: