Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 3 of 3 (0.21 seconds)Sis Kaur vs Jawaharlal Nehru University on 14 September, 2015
Insofar as the judgment in Sis Kaur (supra) is concerned,
counsel for JNU submits that the facts of the said case are
distinguishable. In the said case, Petitioner was appointed in the pay
scale of Rs.1640-2900 as Senior Technical Assistant and the core pay
scale of the said post was later changed to Rs.2000-3500 and in this
background, Petitioner was granted the upgraded scale from his date
of appointment. Respondent was considering the said placement as
upgradation for MACP, which was negated by the Court holding that
the grant of pay scale of Rs.2000-3500 to Sis Kaur was not personal to
her as she was to be treated as appointed in the said scale and
therefore could not be counted/adjusted for the purpose of benefit
under the MACP Scheme.
Bam Dev Chhetri And Ors. vs Jawaharlal Nehru University And Anr. on 22 November, 2013
21. Therefore, applying the judgment to the facts of the present
case, the pay scale of Rs.1640-2900 granted to the Petitioner would be
treated as personal to him and is protected under UGC's directions, as
mentioned above and the case of the Petitioner is covered on all four
corners by the judgment in Bam Dev Chhetri (supra).
1