Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 53 (0.52 seconds)

Shashikant Mohanlal Desai And Ors. vs State Of Gujarat And Ors. on 7 January, 1969

In the case of Shashikant Mohanlal vs. State of Gujarat, (supra), this   Court noticed that as per earlier Section 43, there was a provision to grant   permission   on   payment   of   such   amount   as   may   be   determined   by   the   Collector.  The  said Section  stipulated  for  permission  of transfer  of land   only after the premium to the State is paid, which is the supreme owner of   the land, as the State Government by a general or special order determine,   as per the earlier Section 43, but even after the amendment, the position   does not change.
Gujarat High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 11 - P N Bhagwati - Full Document

Patel Ambalal Gokalbhai vs State Of Gujarat And Ors. on 13 January, 1982

24. The validity of the aforesaid Amendment Act No. XVI of 1960 fell for   consideration   before   the   Supreme   Court   in   the   case   of  Patel   Ambalal   Gokalbhai vs. State of Gujarat, reported in (1982) 3 SCC 316. In the   said case, the Supreme Court held that the Gujarat (Amendment) Act No.   XVI of 1960 is covered by the protective umbrella of 9th  Schedule at its   Entry No. 40 and that, therefore, the constitutionality thereto is immuned   from challenge.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 5 - Full Document

Senior Supdt. Of Post Office & Ors vs Izhar Hussain on 10 August, 1989

Excessive  delegation   of  power  is  arbitrary  and  absolute  discretion   given   without   any   guidelines   is   also   violative   of   Article   14   of   the   Constitution. Reliance was placed on the Supreme Court decision in   the   case   of   Senior  Supdt.   of   Post   Office   vs.   Izhar   Hussain,  reported in AIR 1989 SC 2262.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 55 - K Singh - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 Next