Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.21 seconds)Section 3 in The Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Section 11 in The Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
A.R. Krishna Iyer And Anr. vs The State Of Madras Represented By The ... on 20 March, 1956
6. The identical question whether the differentiation under a similar provision in the Madras Sales Tax Act is not repugnant to Article 14 arose in the Madras High Court before a Division Bench. The decision reported in Krishna Iyer v. State of Madras ([1956] 7 S.T.C. 346; A.I.R. 1956 Mad. 480) was that the proviso to section 3(1)(b) which is the same as in the Mysore Act is void and unenforceable as it offends the Article of the Constitution.
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Central Sales Tax Act, 1956
1