Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 33 (0.39 seconds)

Deepak Gulati vs State Of Haryana on 20 May, 2013

In Deepak Gulati [Deepak Gulati v. State of Haryana, (2013) 7 SCC 675 : (2013) 3 SCC (Cri) 660] this Court observed : (SCC pp. 682-84, paras 21 & 24) "21. ... There is a distinction between the mere breach of a promise, and not fulfilling Signature Not Verified Signed by: ANIL CHOUDHARY Signing time: 6/18/2025 11:01:04 AM 17 MCRC-54176-2023 a false promise. Thus, the court must examine whether there was made, at an early stage a false promise of marriage by the accused; and whether the consent involved was given after wholly understanding the nature and consequences of sexual indulgence. There may be a case where the prosecutrix agrees to have sexual intercourse on account of her love and passion for the accused, and not solely on account of misrepresentation made to her by the accused, or where an accused on account of circumstances which he could not have foreseen, or which were beyond his control, was unable to marry her, despite having every intention to do so. Such cases must be treated differently.
Supreme Court of India Cites 16 - Cited by 425 - B S Chauhan - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next