Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.26 seconds)The Customs Act, 1962
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Union Of India And Others vs Bennett Coleman And Co. Ltd. And Others on 10 September, 1987
In Employees Union v. The Management of Bennet Colman and Company reported in 1964(8) F.L.R, page 720, a learned single Judge of this Court while considering a mater of the second departmental proceeding, held that while accepting the statement made by witnesses of the alleged incident, the enquiry officer was liable to divulge the same to the petitioner as the witnesses should be produced for cross-examination by him, and unless the same is done, the procedure is liable to be quashed as laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of State of Mysore v. Sihawa Bassappa .
Kanungo & Company vs Collector Of Customs And Ors. on 7 February, 1972
17. However, the Supreme Court in construing Section 124 of the Customs Act, appears to have taken a different view in Kanungo & Co. v. Collector of Customs, Calcutta and Ors. reported in 1983 Excises Law Times page 1486 wherein it was clearly held that in a proceeding under the Customs Act the proceedees are not entitled to cross-examine the witnesses.
Article 136 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
1