Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 15 (0.37 seconds)Section 138 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Section 118 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 114 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 251 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 281 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
V.S.Yadav vs Reena on 21 September, 2010
(...) As clarified in the citations, the Accused can rely on
the materials submitted by the Complainant in order to
raise such a defence and it is conceivable that in some
cases the Accused may not need to adduce evidence of
his/her own(...)"(emphasis supplied)
11.6. With regard to the factors taken into account for rebutting the
presumption u/s 139 read with s.118 of the Act, the judgement of
Hon'ble Delhi High Court in V.S. Yadav v. Reena 3 assumes
importance, wherein it was held that:
Rangappa vs Sri Mohan on 7 May, 2010
11.5. Also, in the case of Rangappa v. Sri Mohan2, it was held that: