Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (2.22 seconds)Section 139 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Section 147 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Southern Sales & Services & Ors vs Sauermilch Design & Handels Gmbh on 3 October, 2008
“17. As held by this Court in Southern Sales &
Services v. Sauermilch Design and Handels GmbH
[Southern Sales & Services v. Sauermilch Design and
Handels GmbH, (2008) 14 SCC 457] , it is a well-
established principle of law that the Revisional Court will
not interfere even if a wrong order is passed by a court
having jurisdiction, in the absence of a jurisdictional error.
Section 20 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Bir Singh vs Mukesh Kumar on 6 February, 2019
17. At this juncture, it is apropos to allude to Bir Singh (supra),
wherein, it has been held as under:
Rangappa vs Sri Mohan on 7 May, 2010
21. Though the accused can discharge the burden under Section
139 of the NI Act by preponderance of probability as held by the
Supreme Court in Rangappa Vs. Sri Mohan3, even that has not been
done in this case.