Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 25 (0.31 seconds)

Swarup Chandra De vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 5 February, 2021

Ans. She had prior knowledge of contracts while she was working in Asian Hotels but had no experience of drafting the Will. I have no idea as to who drafted the Will. I speculate that probably she herself typed the alleged Will. I am not sure whether there were one or two copies of the said alleged Will but there could not be more than two. After we signed the Will PC 03/2017: Mrs. Sujata Kumar Suri Vs State & Anr. Page 26 of 45 PC 36/2017: Sh. Indra Swarup Vs State & Ors.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 0 - Cited by 1 - R Bharadwaj - Full Document

Surendra Pal & Ors vs Saraswati Arora & Anr on 9 August, 1974

477. It has also been held by Supreme Court in Surinder Pal vs. Saraswati Arora: (1974) 2 SCC 600 that where propounder takes prominent part in the execution of Will which confers on him a substantial benefit that is itself one of the suspicious circumstance which he must remove by clear evidence. In the present case no evidence is led by appellant to satisfy the conscience of the court to clear the aforesaid suspicious circumstance existing at the time of making of Will Ex.PW1/H. The propounder was required to remove the doubts by clear and satisfactory evidence."
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 175 - P J Reddy - Full Document
1   2 3 Next