Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 40 (0.33 seconds)The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Abhilasha vs Parkash on 15 September, 2020
32. As noted in the case of Abhilasha vs. Parkash (supra),
the family courts have jurisdiction to decide the cases under
Section 125 of the CrPC as well Section 20 of the HAM Act, in
such a duty, the family court can exercise jurisdiction in both
the cases. But such dual power cannot be exercised by a
Magistrate dealing with the proceedings under Section 125 of
the CrPC. While right under Section 20 of the HAM Act needs
determination by a civil court. Thus, it would be a claim never
contemplated to be exercised by the Magistrate who would
have the jurisdiction under Section 125 of CrPC to deal with
the reliefs in summary proceedings.