Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.24 seconds)
Sri. Konappa vs Deputy Commissioner on 11 January, 2023 cites

Nekkanti Rama Lakshmi vs State Of Karnataka on 26 October, 2017

16. It is not in dispute that the Act does not prescribe any specific time period for preferring an application to set aside sale or for restoration of land to the Grantee. But it is settled position of law that an aggrieved person is required to approach the Court/Authorities within reasonable period of time. This aspect of the matter is fortified by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of NEKKANTI RAMA LAKSHMI vs STATE OF KARNATAKA reported in 2020 (14) Scc
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 4 - Cited by 373 - Full Document

Smt Mangamma vs The State Of Karnataka on 24 January, 2020

15. This Court in the case of SMT. MANGAMMA AND OTHERS vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS, in W.A. NO.16/2021 - DD 05.04.2021, has opined that any delay of more than 9 to 10 years without any cogent reason or explanation for the inordinate delay would have to be carefully considered by the Courts. Grantees or their legal representations would have to approach the Cdourts within reasonable time and make out a case for restoration of the land on the basis of bonafide reason, to set aside and that if 10 there is illegality and injustice caused to the grantee, same is liable to be restored & rectified. In the present case on hand nothing has been established or made out by the Grantees with regard to exploitation of their poverty or illiteracy, I do not find that the respondents No.3 and 4 grantees have made out any reason for interference of the case and there is delay of more than 24 years as on the date of registration of the sale deed in favour of the petitioner.
Karnataka High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 2 - H T Prasad - Full Document

Jagadish @ Jagannath vs State Of Karnataka on 27 September, 2010

17. It is further fortified in the case of JAGADISH vs STATE OF KARNATAKA reported in 2019 SCC online 1901. There is an inordinate delay of 24 years from the date of execution of Sale Deed & 50 years from the date of grant, which is glarring at this Court. Hence, I am of the opinion that 24 years is too long a period to condone with regard to delay & nothing is placed on record to show that it is due to bonafide reasons.
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 2 - Full Document
1