Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.19 seconds)
Smt. Kesar Verma vs Kanwar Nursing Home, Dr.Nita Kanwar & ... on 19 November, 2015 cites

V. Kishan Rao vs Nikhil Super Speciality Hospital & Anr on 8 March, 2010

It caused significant fall of blood pressure and removal of uterus became inevitable. The correct technique of forceps application was not adopted by the respondent No.1 (O.P.No.1), therefore, the brain of the child was badly damaged permanently and the baby is permanently handicapped both mentally and physically. The finding recorded by the District Forum is erroneous and the impugned order is liable to be set aside. He placed reliance on D.C. Dutta's Text Book of Obstetrics Page 113; V. Kishan // 17 // Rao Vs. Nikhil Super Speciality Hospital & Anr., III (2010) CPJ 1 (SC); Vinitha Ashok vs. Lakshmi Hospital, LAWS (SC)-2001-9-37 AIR (SCW)-2001-0-3881 / AIR (SC)-2001-0-3914 / SCC-2001-8-731; Poonam Verma vs. Ashwin Patel, LAW (SC)-1996-5-38 SCC-1996-4- 322/SCC-1996-4-322; Master Abhishek Ahluwalia & Ors. Vs. Dr. Sanjay Saluja, MS Ortho, Physiotherapy Clinic & Ors., 2014 (3) CPR 180 (NC); and Bhaskar Kanwar vs. R.K. Gupta & Anr. 2013 (2) CPR 611 (SC).
Supreme Court of India Cites 23 - Cited by 350 - Full Document

Poonam Verma vs Ashwin Patel & Ors on 10 May, 1996

It caused significant fall of blood pressure and removal of uterus became inevitable. The correct technique of forceps application was not adopted by the respondent No.1 (O.P.No.1), therefore, the brain of the child was badly damaged permanently and the baby is permanently handicapped both mentally and physically. The finding recorded by the District Forum is erroneous and the impugned order is liable to be set aside. He placed reliance on D.C. Dutta's Text Book of Obstetrics Page 113; V. Kishan // 17 // Rao Vs. Nikhil Super Speciality Hospital & Anr., III (2010) CPJ 1 (SC); Vinitha Ashok vs. Lakshmi Hospital, LAWS (SC)-2001-9-37 AIR (SCW)-2001-0-3881 / AIR (SC)-2001-0-3914 / SCC-2001-8-731; Poonam Verma vs. Ashwin Patel, LAW (SC)-1996-5-38 SCC-1996-4- 322/SCC-1996-4-322; Master Abhishek Ahluwalia & Ors. Vs. Dr. Sanjay Saluja, MS Ortho, Physiotherapy Clinic & Ors., 2014 (3) CPR 180 (NC); and Bhaskar Kanwar vs. R.K. Gupta & Anr. 2013 (2) CPR 611 (SC).
Supreme Court of India Cites 18 - Cited by 127 - K Singh - Full Document

Bhanwar Kanwar vs R.K.Gupta & Anr on 5 April, 2013

It caused significant fall of blood pressure and removal of uterus became inevitable. The correct technique of forceps application was not adopted by the respondent No.1 (O.P.No.1), therefore, the brain of the child was badly damaged permanently and the baby is permanently handicapped both mentally and physically. The finding recorded by the District Forum is erroneous and the impugned order is liable to be set aside. He placed reliance on D.C. Dutta's Text Book of Obstetrics Page 113; V. Kishan // 17 // Rao Vs. Nikhil Super Speciality Hospital & Anr., III (2010) CPJ 1 (SC); Vinitha Ashok vs. Lakshmi Hospital, LAWS (SC)-2001-9-37 AIR (SCW)-2001-0-3881 / AIR (SC)-2001-0-3914 / SCC-2001-8-731; Poonam Verma vs. Ashwin Patel, LAW (SC)-1996-5-38 SCC-1996-4- 322/SCC-1996-4-322; Master Abhishek Ahluwalia & Ors. Vs. Dr. Sanjay Saluja, MS Ortho, Physiotherapy Clinic & Ors., 2014 (3) CPR 180 (NC); and Bhaskar Kanwar vs. R.K. Gupta & Anr. 2013 (2) CPR 611 (SC).
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 14 - Full Document
1