Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.27 seconds)
Gaurav Pratap Singh vs State Of U.P. on 18 June, 2020 cites

Dataram Singh vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 6 February, 2018

"The grant or refusal of bail is entirely within the discretion of the Judge hearing the matter and though that discretion is unfettered, it must be exercised judiciously and in a humane manner and compassionately. Also condition for the grant of bail ought not to be so strict as to be incapable of compliance, there by making the grant of bail illusory."[para 6 of Dataram (supra)].
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 35378 - M B Lokur - Full Document

State Of U.P. And 2 Others vs Raj Surya Pratap Singh Chauhan on 8 May, 2015

In backdrop of above legal position, after considering the rival submissions and record, without commenting on the merit of the case, let the Appellant, Gaurav Pratap Singh, be released on bail in Session Trial No. 1186 of 2011 (State of U.P. vs. Gaurav Pratap Singh), Case Crime No. 304 of 2010, under Sections 307/34, 323/34 IPC, Police Station Chakeri, District Kanpur Nagar, during pending appeal on following conditions:-
Allahabad High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 8 - R Kumar - Full Document

Atul Tripathi vs State Of U.P. & Anr on 22 July, 2014

4. Suspension of sentence by the Appellate Court, during pending appeal, preferred by convicted person and to release on bail is provided under section 389 Cr.P.C. The Appellate Court may even without hearing the counsel for State decline bail. However in case Appellate Court is inclined to consider the release of convict on bail, the counsel for State shall be granted an opportunity to show cause in writing as to why the appellant be not released on bail, more specifically if the convict is sentenced for death or imprisonment for life or for a period of ten years or more. (See, Atul Tripathi Vs State of Uttar Pradesh : (2014) 9 SCC 177).
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 405 - Full Document
1