Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 37 (2.80 seconds)Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Calcutta Gas Company (Proprietary) ... vs The State Of West Bengal And Others on 5 February, 1962
It is implicit in the exercise of such
extraordinary jurisdiction that the relief prayed for
must be one to enforce a legal right. Infact, the
existence of such right, is the foundation of the
exercise of the said jurisdiction by the Court. The legal
right that can be enforced must ordinarily be the right
of the appellant himself, who complains of infraction
of such right and approaches the Court for relief as
regards the same. [Vide : State of Orissa v. Madan
Gopal Rungta, Saghir Ahmad v. State of U.P., Calcutta
Gas Company (Proprietary) Ltd. v. State of West
Bengal; Rajendra Singh v. State of Madhya Pradesh;
and Tamilnad Mercantile Bank Shareholders Welfare
Association (2) v. S.C. Sekar.]
Ghulam Qadir vs Special Tribunal & Ors on 3 October, 2001
In Ghulam Qadir v. Special Tribunal & Ors., this
Court considered a similar issue and observed as
under:- (SCC P.54, para 38)
The Punjab Land Revenue Rules
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Specific Relief Act, 1963
Ayaaubkhan Noorkhan Pathan vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors on 8 November, 2012
(i) Ayaaubkhan Noorkhan Pathan vs. State of
Maharashtra and Ors. [(2013)4 SCC 465]. Para 9, 10,
11, 12, 13, 16 and 19 reads as under:
The State Of Orissa vs Madan Gopal Rungta.The State Of ... on 25 October, 1951
It is implicit in the exercise of such
extraordinary jurisdiction that the relief prayed for
must be one to enforce a legal right. Infact, the
existence of such right, is the foundation of the
exercise of the said jurisdiction by the Court. The legal
right that can be enforced must ordinarily be the right
of the appellant himself, who complains of infraction
of such right and approaches the Court for relief as
regards the same. [Vide : State of Orissa v. Madan
Gopal Rungta, Saghir Ahmad v. State of U.P., Calcutta
Gas Company (Proprietary) Ltd. v. State of West
Bengal; Rajendra Singh v. State of Madhya Pradesh;
and Tamilnad Mercantile Bank Shareholders Welfare
Association (2) v. S.C. Sekar.]
Saghir Ahmad vs The State Of U. P. And Others.(With ... on 13 October, 1954
It is implicit in the exercise of such
extraordinary jurisdiction that the relief prayed for
must be one to enforce a legal right. Infact, the
existence of such right, is the foundation of the
exercise of the said jurisdiction by the Court. The legal
right that can be enforced must ordinarily be the right
of the appellant himself, who complains of infraction
of such right and approaches the Court for relief as
regards the same. [Vide : State of Orissa v. Madan
Gopal Rungta, Saghir Ahmad v. State of U.P., Calcutta
Gas Company (Proprietary) Ltd. v. State of West
Bengal; Rajendra Singh v. State of Madhya Pradesh;
and Tamilnad Mercantile Bank Shareholders Welfare
Association (2) v. S.C. Sekar.]